I recommend it as a starting point for similar tasks. It's GUI is the browser, making it a simple cross-platform editor. ![]() It is a text-editor, geared towards writing Perl. This makes it rather easy for your webapp to feel more like a true application, talking back to the server and getting responses without reloading.Įdit: I now have a good example of a desktop application written with a Perl/Mojo backend and a web-frontent: Azawawi's Farabi. The following table lists all the packages in the CodeReady Linux Builder repository along with their license. Then again, this is the reason that others would recommend Dancer, so that's a toss.Ī final consideration is that Mojo comes with WebSockets out of the box. My primary reason for suggesting Mojo over Dancer is that Mojo comes with lots of functionality in one tiny package. I would suggest Mojolicious though other people do like Dancer. Warning you probably don’t want to use CGI for modern web. The goal of it is to design a Visual Basic like. It’s also the name of the Perl module we used (and for me, still use) to code for the web. Perl Composer is a two-way visual tool used to design graphical interfaces for X-windows using Perl/GTK. Still, I think you might be better served (hehe) by using a web front-end than a true GUI these days this is easy using a web-framework. CGI stands for Common Gateway Interface, it’s a protocol for executing scripts via web requests, and in the late 1990’s was the main way to write dynamic programs for the Web. Would you compare the tools in terms of human efficiency (easy to read and write codes), computational efficiency and the availability of GUI builder?įor real cross platform GUI programming I would suggest Prima or Tk. Yet, I can't decide which one to go and the online information sometimes looks contradict each other. I could managed to install them and succeeded to show "Hello, world".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |